Portfolio Skills
This page is a living technical record of skills, tools, and engineering practices demonstrated in this project.
Project Overview
- Project Type: Creative Coding / Generative Art
- Primary Runtime: Node.js
- Rendering Library: p5.js
- Primary Implementation Language: TypeScript
At a Glance
- Current sketch count (wired to runtime): 1
- CI runtime coverage: 3 Node.js versions (
20.x,22.x,24.x) - Automation workflows: 4 GitHub Actions workflows (build, test, security analysis, deployment)
- Documentation approach: Source-linked evidence + generated API docs
Skills and Tooling Inventory
- Programming Languages: TypeScript, JavaScript, HTML, CSS, Markdown, YAML
- Runtime & Libraries: Node.js, p5.js
- TypeSafety & Validation: TypeBox, Zod
- Testing: Vitest
- Bundling: webpack
- Code Quality: ESLint
- Documentation: TypeDoc
- Site Generation: Bundler, Jekyll, Liquid
- Dependency Management: npm, GitHub Dependabot
- Versioning & Platform: Git, GitHub
- CI/CD: GitHub Actions, GitHub Pages, CodeQL
- Environment Management: n, rbenv
- Development Environments: WebStorm, Visual Studio Code
- AI-Assisted Development: GitHub Copilot
Capability Record
- Interface-driven architecture for sketch implementations
- Class-based visual logic organized around p5 lifecycle hooks
- Typed entrypoint composition and runtime binding
- Schema-driven type definitions using TypeBox and Zod
- Runtime type validation via discriminator pattern across multiple schema libraries
- Static validator utilities for number and string types
- Parameterized unit testing with Vitest
- CI-based lint, build, and test verification
- Automated static site deployment and project documentation generation
- AI-assisted feature development and pair programming using GitHub Copilot agentic workflows
Detailed Technical Notes
Interface-driven sketch model
- A shared
Sketchinterface defines the implementation contract for sketch modules. - This keeps sketch integration consistent and reduces coupling between entrypoint and sketch logic.
- Evidence:
Entrypoint composition
- Application startup instantiates a sketch implementation and binds its
mainfunction to p5. - This keeps orchestration logic centralized and minimal.
- Evidence:
Sketch implementation pattern
- Sketch behavior is encapsulated in class methods mapped to p5 lifecycle hooks (
setup,draw). - This supports focused iteration on visual behavior while preserving shared conventions.
- Evidence:
Quality validation workflows
- CI runs lint/build and test checks on
pushandpull_requesttomain. - Build and test workflows run across multiple Node.js versions to improve compatibility confidence.
- Evidence:
Documentation and delivery workflows
- TypeDoc is configured for API documentation generation.
- GitHub Pages deployment is automated via Jekyll workflow configuration.
- Evidence:
AI-assisted development with GitHub Copilot
- GitHub Copilot is used for agentic coding workflows, including automated code generation, refactoring, and implementation of new features via natural language prompts.
- Copilot pair programming is used interactively during development to accelerate iteration and maintain code quality.
- Evidence:
Schema-driven type definitions
- Runtime types for domain objects (
Discriminable,Palette,PaletteColor,AspectRatioConfig) are derived directly from TypeBox or Zod schemas usingStatic<typeof Schema>orz.infer<typeof SCHEMA>. - This eliminates duplication between the type definition and its validation logic and ensures that compile-time types and runtime validation stay in sync.
- Evidence:
Runtime type validation via discriminator pattern
- The
Discriminatorstatic class validates objects at runtime using a two-step approach: first checking adiscriminatorfield for a type tag match, then applying the full TypeBox or Zod schema parse. - This combines lightweight tag-based narrowing with exhaustive schema validation, and works uniformly across both schema libraries.
- Evidence:
Static validator utilities
NumberValidatorandStringValidatorare static utility classes that expose reusable validation predicates and regular expression patterns (e.g., hex color format matching).- Both classes use a private constructor with a runtime
throwto prevent instantiation, ensuring they are always used as namespaces rather than objects. - Evidence:
Parameterized unit testing with Vitest
- Unit tests use
test.eachfor parameterized cases, covering valid and invalid inputs including boundary values (zero, negative numbers, non-finite values, empty strings, non-string types). - Shared test input constants are centralized under
test/utils/input/and reused across test suites to keep coverage consistent. - Evidence: